极端主义造成的社会

To move or not to move, a dilemma that had been plaguing Weng Biao for two months was finally resolved in a burning way. With his two-room shack knocked down by the government's bulldozer, Weng made a desperate attempt of pouring a can of gasoline on himself and sparking a fire.

　　He was dead,which raised the tension between the government and the inhabitants to move greater than ever. So who is to blame? No specific culprit but the society itself. It is the ill social response to those in need that led to the behavior of extremism and the ensuing un

　　Weng's story typifies the buddyship between social instability and extreme behavior. The bulldozer not only pulled down the family's shelter but their last hope of getting the justice done as well. Without home, without fear. It is the boldness from despair that ignited the wanton breach of social rule, which basically comes in the form of extreme behavior like self-burning. Turmoil, the state of rulelessness,thus started.

　　But where's the society? Has it ever done something to stop the tragedy? No! All we can see is silence till the burning day.And the worse is yet to come. In the case of Zhang Xinpin, a depressed boy who jumped out of the building to death because of wowing from the spectators.

　　Society simply facilitates the sad end by inducing the victim to the extreme.

　　Throw the cards of neglect and instigation into the trash box, and we get the trump. That is the care for others. If Weng Biao had been